WW16: How to Look for 10 Minutes

A woman in a black coat and black headscarf stands in front of a wall of paintings inside an art museume in Indonesia. We see her from behind and can only assume she is looking intently at the art. The low lighting has been specially designed to draw atte

WW 16: How to Look for 10 Minutes

It's Wonder Wednesdsay, so I set myself a little Monday challenge.

On the first Monday of every month, the New York Times publishes a "focus challenge." The digital edition selects a work of art and invites you to look at it for 10 minutes. No scrolling, no multitasking, no checking your phone​ — just you and a painting for 600 seconds.

I tried once before with a still life of flowers. I made it four minutes before my brain started screaming for dopamine. This month, I was determined to try again with Gustav Klimt's Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I. Not just for the sake of content, but to notice why looking made me so uncomfortable and to wonder if any of this (art, attention, etc.) matters in this moment when the entire world is on edge.

Ready to wonder along?

The Small Idea: Looking Closely is a Learnable Skill (and We're Out of Practice)

The Spark: 10-Minute Challenge: Klimt's Woman in Gold, New York Times.

How do you look at one painting for 10 minutes? The same way you get to Carnegie Hall: practice, practice, practice.

Nancy Martira

Clew Strategy

I'd never heard of Gustav Klimt until I arrived in Austria in August 2001. Soon, I saw Klimt every time I turned my head. His works are as ubiquitous as the gold foil-wrapped Mozart Kugeln sold in every tourist shop. I was a third-year university student settling in for a year abroad in Vienna. I was there to learn about this new fad of European integration; I found myself in the home of Mozart, Beethoven, Mahler, Klimt, and Schiele almost as an afterthought.

Klimt's art is plastered across Vienna: from dorm rooms and tourist traps to the Leopold Museum and Vienna Secession Exhibition Hall. I've seen Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I many times: I've seen it appear as cheap posters in IKEA frames and I've seen the original painting up close at the Neue Galerie in New York City. Now, nudged by the New York Times, I was about to look at it again. But what was I looking for?

The challenge is deceptively simple: spend 10 minutes looking at one painting. You can zoom in on the painting, but there's no wall placard. Just look at the image on your screen and notice what you notice.

I've never studied art, but I like to go to art museums. Like cathedrals and churches of the old world, I find art museums familiar and peaceful. And also like visiting Catholic churches, I get the sense that in an art museum, I almost, but not quite, belong.

Here's the best thing about visiting basilicas around the world: even a lapsed Catholic like me knows exactly what to do. Sure, you can pray if you like, but if you need a little more structure, you can always light a candle. You put a coin in the box, light a candle, and honor the memory of your dead. It's universal, it's transactional, it's eternal.

If an art museum is like a cathedral, then looking at the art feels like prayer. I need a little more scaffolding to prop me up. What am I looking for? Am I supposed to start in the upper right corner and gaze left to right, up and down? Do I have to look at every painting? How long does it take to properly look at a painting? This is why most of us end up in the gift shop.

If an art museum is like a cathedral, "looking at the art" feels like prayer. I need a little more scaffolding to prop me up.

Our Attention Crisis

You may have heard that humans today have the attention span of a goldfish. This old chestnut is oft repeated by marketers to stress the importance of hooking your audience in the first 2.8 seconds or whatever the nonsense number is now.

Although the goldfish fun fact has been debunked, I think it's pretty clear that we have a problem. The Center for Attention Studies at King's College London published a report in 2022. 47% of people surveyed agree with the statement "'Deep Thinking' has become a thing of the past." Yikes, right? But also, that explains so much.

Estimates now put the human attention span at around 47 seconds, so let me assure you: 10 minutes feels like an eternity. This isn't inevitable cognitive decline. It's environmental adaptation. We've trained ourselves to scroll, to skim, to process information in rapid bursts because that's what our devices reward. As neuroscientist Amishi Jha explains, "Attention is trainable. It's like a muscle—use it or lose it."

The 10-minute challenge isn't really about art appreciation. It's about recovering a capacity we've systematically trained ourselves out of: the ability to stay with one thing long enough to begin to see it.

Attention is trainable. It's like a muscle - use it or lose it. -Amishi Jha

Museum Anxiety

Every time I enter a museum, my mind immediately goes to thinking about art heists. I bet I'm not the only one (unless this is a strange legacy of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum heist imprinting on me during my formative years.) I don't know the unspoken rules of art museums, the secret handshake of art historians. So even just entering the building feels a little dangerous, a little nefarious.

I believe this anxiety is at the root of our museum behavior. Research on museum behavior consistently shows that visitors spend surprisingly little time looking at individual artworks — often less than 30 seconds — with much of that time spent reading labels rather than looking at the piece itself. Now when I walk into a museum, I give myself a little pep talk: there is no wrong way to look. The point isn't to decode some hidden meaning the artist has embedded for MFA graduates; this is not The DaVinci Code. The point is to practice seeing what is there.

Harvard art historian Jennifer L. Roberts has her students spend three hours looking at a single artwork. Three hours. Can you imagine? Roberts has a lot to say about "deceleration and immersive attention," but honestly I just skimmed the article. (See what I did there?) Hey, why don't you read the article and tell me something insightful that you learned.

[Insert your own brilliant transition paragraph here]

Why Looking Matters Now

In an age of AI-generated images, deepfakes, and algorithmically curated reality, the ability to look closely isn't about taste and preference; it's survival.

When I can't tell if that photo is "real" or computer-generated, when headlines are designed to trigger rather than inform, when my entire media diet is optimized to keep me outraged — sustained attention becomes an act of resistance.

Media literacy expert Renee Hobbs (shoutout URI!!) argues that close looking is foundational to critical thinking: "If we can't slow down enough to actually see what we're looking at, we can't evaluate it, question it, or think critically about it."

The 10-minute challenge trains exactly this muscle: the ability to stay with something long enough to move past your initial reaction and see what's actually there.

Here are two small experiments to try:

The 10 Minute Challenge

Pick any artwork—from the New York Times challenge, your local museum's website, or even a painting you pass every day. Set a timer for 10 minutes. Just look. When your mind wanders (and it will), gently bring your attention back to the image. Notice colors, patterns, textures. Notice where your eye wants to rest. Notice the discomfort of staying put.

The Wall Text Rebellion

Next time you visit an art museum (or scroll through an online collection), completely ignore the wall text. Don't read about the artist, the period, the technique. Just look at three pieces for as long as you want—30 seconds or 30 minutes. Then, if you're curious, read the context. Notice how your direct experience compares to the "official" interpretation.

The Wonder of Sustained Attention

At the risk of self-aggrandizement, there's something quietly radical about spending 10 minutes looking at one thing in 2026. It's a small rebellion against the attention economy that profits from our distraction. It's training for a deeper way of being in the world—one where we can stay with complexity, sit with discomfort, and see beyond our first impressions.

In the 1940s, the Nazis seized Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I, removed her name, and called the painting The Woman in Gold. There's an entire fascinating story there for you to explore (the Wikipedia page is a good starting point.) It's an honor and a priveledge to spend any time at all with Adele.

When you look at something long enough, it becomes impossible to reduce it to a label. The Nazis tried to strip away Adele's Jewish identity, recast her as a generic woman instead of a person with status and vanity and sensuality, a complicated marriage, a life cut short by meningitis at age 43.

Sustained attention is an act of resistance against reduction. When we take the time to look​ — not glance, or scroll, but genuinely see​ — we encounter complexity that defies easy categorization. We see the swirls like a Minoan labyrinth, the eye of Horus from Egypt, the crooked finger she took great pains to hide. We see a human being who existed in a specific time and place, loved and suffered and sat for countless hours in an artist's studio.

The painting doesn't need me to understand it. It just invites me to show up and look. Everything else​ — the meaning, the connection, the wonder​ — emerges from that simple act of sustained attention.

The real challenge isn't focusing for 10 minutes; the challenge is whether we're willing to practice seeing what's actually there instead of settling for the label someone else has given it.


The Question

When was the last time you gave something your undivided attention for 10 minutes? What might you discover about the world if you practiced looking more closely?

Did someone forward you this email? Congratulations! You've got excellent taste in friends. Use the button below to subscribe to Wonder Work. You'll receive the next edition directly in your inbox.

And now for the Mystery Link!

And now for the Mystery Link! Related to the content today, here are two stories about Stendhal Syndrome! And, as a bonus, a creepy quote from Rainer Maria Rilke!

"... for beauty is nothing

but the beginning of terror,

which we can just barely endure..."

So, which will you choose: Door Number One or Door Number Two?

Work with Nancy and Borrow My Wild Brain

(or buy me a coffee.)

Meet Nancy Martira.
I'm a brand strategist and communications consultant who brings endless curiosity to every project. If you've got a challenge that needs a fresh, unexpected perspective, let's talk!


"To invent your own life's meaning is not easy, but it's still allowed, and I think you'll be happier for it."

​ ​ — Bill Watterson

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Wonder Work

Communications consultant, brand strategist, & Wonder Work creator. Curious about everything from terrible orchestras to happiness algorithms. Feed your curiosity; starve the doom — one small idea at a time. Let's wonder!